Search for: "Cohen v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2007, 9:02 am
Former Secretary of State William Cohen could not have legally wed his wife Janet Langhart and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas would never have been permitted to propose to his wife.Are you detecting a pattern? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The Court’s most recent federal Indian law decision, United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
This would not be possible without the hard work of our multi-state team composed of Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Bruce Buchanan and myself, John Gihon. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:16 am
City of Chicago, in which the Court held that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in self-defense applies against state and local governments. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
“According to the complaint, on October 9, 2017, plaintiff retained defendant Cohen Clair, Lans Greifer, Thorpe Rottenstreich, LLP (law firm), including Michael Calogero and Bernard E. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen discusses the case, noting that “just below the surface is a dispute about how far the state may go to punish someone for acting without criminal intent. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
“Strong” v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:30 pm
Cohen [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm
Cohen represents conscious business leaders in a transformational era. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
In Hein v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 2:48 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Glenn Cohen, Elizabeth Sepper, eds. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
At Time, Adam Cohen takes a look at Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Supreme Court case entitled, Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Supreme Court case entitled, Jacobson v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Stephen Schuster of the Superior Court of Cobb County in Marietta, Georgia, and lawyers David Givelber and Nancy Lawler, both of Cohen, Pollock, Merlin & Small in Atlanta, took the audience through the esoteric but increasingly more important topic of challenging expert witnesses under the Daubert rule (named after one of the litigants in the case of Daubert v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
As I noted when FCC v. [read post]
