Search for: "Cooper v. California"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Now California may be moving in that direction. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
North Carolina, No. 13-633, and Cooper v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:39 am
Hai Ba Trung v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In section number I, Orrick discusses the need to require a discovery conference under Rule 16(b)(3)(B)(v). , Orrick compared judges in Ohio and California who did and did not have a local rule requiring Rule 16 discovery conferences with the Court. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
In its badly misguided decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
In California Motor Transport Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
California, 13-494, a capital case involving a Batson challenge arising out of a crime allegedly committed in California’s newest entrepreneurial hot spot. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:50 pm
In a summary judgment order entered late on Tuesday (January 21, 2014), Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Kendall v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
After United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
In Haag v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Supp.2d 556 (D.N.J. 2013), along with Cooper v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
The court relied on the Ninth Circuit’s earlier decision in Rossi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:03 am
Other cases, by virtue of their issues or parties, are virtually guaranteed to see an appeal–or many; here I’m thinking of a case like Apple v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Farms, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:14 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:21 pm
See how the Supreme Court of Tennessee addresses these issues in Cooper v. [read post]
