Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
S., at 693; see United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:32 pm
United States FAA v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
United Yarn Tex. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
1st_Circuit_seal.png In a pyramid scheme case, the First Circuit affirms the limitation of defense cross-examination of a prosecution witness about the nature of the charges against the witness currently pending in state court; trial judge properly allowed defense to raise only the probative aspect of the extrinsic evidence (about the possible motivation of the witness to ingratiate himself with the government by cooperating in the pyramid scheme prosecution),… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:00 pm
Innis, supra, at 301 (officer's subjective intent to incriminate not determinative of whether "interrogation" occurred); United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
See Hickman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:05 pm
A couple of weeks earlier, however, the Supreme Court of the United States, known as SCOTUS, threw a wrench into Regan’s plans by agreeing to hear the case known as Sackett v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:18 am
The United States government has concluded that she is being wrongfully detained. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:54 am
United States, No. 10-5443. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
