Search for: "Correction Officer J. May" Results 841 - 860 of 2,353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2019, 10:25 am
In one recent case, [a]n American mutual fund manager said in an SEC filing [] that it sold all shares it held in Petrofac because of an ongoing corruption investigation by the UK’s Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:13 am by Kevin Kaufman
The accounts in the lower-left and upper-right quadrants have the correct, neutral treatment of saving, with every dollar being taxed only once. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project blog has a post entitled “Mail Online forced to publish correction after its inaccurate reporting of a Family Court case”. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:03 am by Guido Paola
It reads as follows:Notwithstanding Rule 109, paragraph 3, EPC the [Enlarged] Board may consider new submissions made by the petitioner after expiry of the time limit for filing petitions for review, if this is justified for special reasons.In reaction to the Enlarged Board’s communication annexed to the summons to oral proceedings a document, including an appendix, was filed. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Carnegie Endowment President William J. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
§115(d)(3)(J)(iv)] The Collective is not liable for “good-faith administration of policies and procedures adopted and implemented to carry out” these provisions, “except to the extent of correcting an underpayment or overpayment of royalties. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 5:43 pm by Benjamin Wittes
With the partial exception of the Paul Manafort cluster of cases, which were—in any event—the subject of an additional, clarifying referral letter to Mueller and appear to have resulted from a preexisting U.S. attorney’s office invest [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
p. 2 keep it “totally secret[,] because one day we [may] need to escape the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Additionally, the case considers the correct characterisation of an action for breach of privacy and therefore, the nature of the damages which may be awarded. [read post]