Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm
A remarkable story in its own right, Jesse Ruffin happens to be owned by Thomas Ruffin, the author of State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Yesterday, the Missouri Supreme Court in Watts v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
Darby, 2000 OK 1 (nonprecedential) (hospital); Cox Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:08 pm
Cox v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
Anders also obtained and submitted an administrative subpoena to Cox Communications, the owner of the IP address at issue. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Cox, 170 S.W.3d 389 (Ky.2005); Fowler v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:20 pm
” The double-jeopardy issue in the case, the footnote said, was a federal issue that was “finally decided by the highest court in Puerto Rico” and — quoting the Court’s 1975 ruling in Cox Broadcasting v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Wentworth SSC Ltd v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:26 pm
Carl v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 5:43 am
Cox, 2008 Mo. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:09 pm
" Cox v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
Cox, Deference, Delegation, and Immigration Law, 74 U Chi L Rev 1671 (2007) Richard A. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
STEWART, COX, AND HATCHER, P.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am
Davis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Ch 7 dbtr lacks standing to challenge case admin. bec it lacks pecuniary int. in outcome, incl 363 sales. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Miller-D-MD-Titus-8-24-11.pdf … D-NC: Gen. unsec. cr. has standing to assert eq. subord. claim by showing a particul. injury different from other crs. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/BlackPalmDevp-WDNC-Reidinger-10-13-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Dgs. for Chrysler's breach of tax exemption agr. are not… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
” “This decision and its predecessor — the District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
In Cox v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Sony Music Entertainment v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:39 pm
In Cox Broadcasting v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am
As Mrs Justice Cox made similar points in the December 2009 incarnation of this dispute (British Airways Plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWHC 3541 (QB) (17 December 2009)), saying that she was bound by that decision and could not therefore go behind it in order to declare that the statutory framework ran contrary to the Human Rights Act. [read post]
