Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 841 - 860
of 4,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 7(1) provides: 7 (1) In a representation agreement made under this section, an adult may authorize his or her representative to help the adult make decisions, or to make decisions on behalf of the adult, about any or all of the following:(a) the adult's personal care;(b) routine management of the adult's financial affairs, including, subject to the regulations,(i) payment of bills,(ii) receipt and deposit of pension and other income,(iii) … [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
R(A) v Lambeth; R(Lindsay) v Lambeth [2002] EWCA Civ 1084 applied. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
Ends of all accessible control cables shall be provided with protective caps or otherwise treated to prevent unraveling. [read post]
14 May 2008, 3:55 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Media Online Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 5:18 pm
For example, in Peyton v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:58 am
Div. 2004), aff’d as modified, 183 N.J. 290 (2005). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
The latter two safe harbors are the most relevant to social media companies and user-generated content (UGC) websites, namely §§ 512(c) and (d). [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 4:34 am
§ 1447(d) ("An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise[.] [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
General guidance on confidentiality: the Fujifilm v Kodak decision, LD Düsseldorf, UPC_CFI_355/2023, 27 March 2024 In these proceedings, the defence to infringement was based on a prior use argument deriving from an acquisition in 2017. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
(c) Risk Management. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Sedar v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
B subcontracts with C to install a roof and with D to pour a driveway. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:30 am
D. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 4:23 pm
In Oiye v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:14 am
The Australian Patents Act 1990 requires, in section 18(1)(c) and 18(1A)(c), that an invention must be ‘useful’ in order to be patentable. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:55 am
Even if the shape is sufficiently distinctive because it departs significantly from the norms and customs of the sector concerned, it can still be subject to a rejection on functionality grounds, as the judgment Wajos v EUIPO (Forme d´un contenant) in case T-10/22 shows. [read post]
17 May 2018, 2:15 pm
In Story v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm
Skaskiw v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
D.C. v. [read post]
