Search for: "D. Cox"
Results 841 - 860
of 991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 9:08 pm
As the Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox, has said, “these [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
Russell Sandberg: How Not to Deal with Unregistered Religious Marriages: on Baroness Cox’s “inappropriate, ineffective and inflammatory” private Member’s bill. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Borrowing again from Delaware law, the court explained that “Delaware courts interpreting” a similar statute “have concluded that it provides that only disinterested shareholders votes may be considered” in ratification of a board decision (citing In re Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In the recent Crystal Cox case, the Ninth Circuit reversed a ruling that only traditional forms of media and not bloggers were entitled to First Amendment protection. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 2:10 am
Often, leaders who’d be perfectly suitable during normal times are not cut out for leading during crisis situations and vice versa. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
The Court does not address a question that I’d think would have to come first: why would doctors have a privacy interest in their prescribing decisions? [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 2:10 am
Often, leaders who’d be perfectly suitable during normal times are not cut out for leading during crisis situations and vice versa. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
Section 541(d) is quite an interesting provision. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:46 am
• John D. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Edgerton, Peter D. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:53 am
" Many D&O insurance policies have express exclusions precluding coverage for the amount of any additional consideration paid to settle a bump up claim. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Infringement The removal of the blanket license for licenses that host political events has led to a number of C&D letters and the occasional lawsuit against the Trump campaign, highlighting the importance of the ASCAP etc. licenses for daily business life, and also highlighting the relevance of privately negotiated agreements to changing statutory schemes. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
June 13, 2000); Cox v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
(The Supreme Court consolidated Ortiz’s case with two other cases, Cox v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:24 am
” Cox v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Monday’s oral argument in the DAPA case confirmed what I’ve tried to explain in several previous postsabout the substantive merits of the case: Although Texas's lawsuit was originally focused on the alleged illegality of DHS’s provisional decision not to remove DAPA-qualified aliens, Texas now concedes that such forbearance of removal is lawful, at least as long as Congress only appropriates funds for DHS to remove 400,000 of the eleven million removable aliens in the… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Unlike, say, the specific military plans for D-Day, atomic secrets were in a sense “public,” because anyone with a properly outfitted and funded laboratory could discover them. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Sheehan: in practice there’d be little difference. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
Supp.2d 269 (D. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
at 1 & n.1 (D. [read post]
