Search for: "DOE INSURERS 21 through 30"
Results 841 - 860
of 955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States (08-1196) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether, to convict a state official for depriving the public of its right to the defendant’s honest services through the non-disclosure of material information, in violation of the mail-fraud statute (18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Past studies suggest that anal exposure to HIV poses 30 times more risk than vaginal exposure. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
The Court stated that although the failure to inform a defendant of the proper minimum and maximum sentences that can be imposed is not a jurisdictional defect, such a failure does raise a question of the voluntariness of a guilty plea based on that misinformation. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
In such cases, petitioners must notify the Commission of their intent to rely on materials previously submitted.Such reliance does not affect petitioners’ obligation to demonstrate that they meet all requirements of this paragraph as required by subparagraph (B)(ii). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
Scope disputes are coverage disputes, and, in my opinion, this new legislation does not require insurers to surrender disputed coverage issues to resolution in the appraisal process. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
A person violating the FCA is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of at least $5,500 and not more than $11,000 per violation plus three times the amount of damages sustained by the Government.[19] If the Government does not proceed with the case, the whistle-blower is still allowed to conduct the case.[20] Upon prevailing under these circumstances, the FCA directs that the whistle-blower shall receive a reasonable sum for collecting the civil penalty and damages which… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
Like other states, Illinois presents contractors with the option of filing mechanic’s liens as a means of insuring payment. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:52 am
Employers The Affordable Care Act does not expressly require employers to offer health care coverage. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
I have earlier written articles on the application of law of Arbitration to the Company disputes and especially the impact of the Arbitration Agreement on the jurisdiction of the Company Law Board and the Company Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:23 am
Furthermore, there is no more life time cap on insurance, 30 million uninsured American’s will now get medical insurance. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Not only does the company that’s sitting on the line of bankruptcy need more liquidity in their security, but also the creditor selling the security would sometimes rather sell their security to an interested third party than risk getting less back on their claims through bankruptcy. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
No. 95-746, at 21 (1977).These Congressional purposes are not much focused on, if focused on at all, by the briefs of SIPC and the Trustee. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
Wang insults the victims just like Sheehan did, but she does it by parroting the briefs of SIPC and the Trustee. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm
Temporary Increase in the Number of Professional Visas Available There will be an increase from 65,000 to 115,000 visas for fiscal year 1999 and 2000 (through September 30, 2000). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
Others see dietary supplements as a type of insurance: "There is a big discrepancy between what people think they eat and what they actually are eating," said Kelly Dorfman, a nutritionist in North Potomac. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
Others see dietary supplements as a type of insurance: "There is a big discrepancy between what people think they eat and what they actually are eating," said Kelly Dorfman, a nutritionist in North Potomac. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:19 pm
The answer is 30-35,000. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:07 am
Finally, in cases such as this where the first layer of coverage was written through policies with self-insured retentions, the court declared that the insured need only pay a proportional share of the SIR for each triggered policy. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 7:48 am
But they have been improved and in some areas sharpened through this process and the associated discussion. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 pm
It does not mean we are back to business as usual. [read post]
