Search for: "DOES 1-116"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 1:50 am
Crowder, 99 S.W.3d 116, 123 (Tenn. [read post]
19 May 2012, 11:01 am
The Board did not come to the same conclusion:[2] In the Board’s view, the presence of the term “boundary portion” in claim 1 does not result in subject-matter extending beyond the content of the originally filed parent application so that, in this respect, the ground for opposition based on A 100(c) EPC 1973 does not prejudice the maintenance of the European patent. [2.1] When the amendments examined as to their admissibility under A 100(c) EPC… [read post]
19 May 2012, 5:25 am
That worked out to an average of 116 prescriptions per beneficiary. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Kali Singh [(1977) 1 SCC 57], Mr. [read post]
5 May 2012, 11:01 am
If a party informs the board that it does not intend to attend the OPs, the board is not obliged to hold OPs in the absence of the party. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:23 pm
Well it sometimes does matter. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:39 pm
Sefranka, 382 Mass. 108, 116 (1980). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
Davis, (2008) 116 Ohio St.3d 404. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Co., 116 F.3d 373, 376 (9th Cir. 1997), where the Ninth Circuit implicitly indicated that a paper filed in federal court may trigger § 1446(b)’s second thirty-day removal period. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:25 pm
The Weber's claimed special damages in the amount of $51 for glasses, $2400 for lost wages, $116 for hospital fees and $196 for doctors. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
1.? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
WHAT DOES “RESTRAINT OF ANIMALS” CODE SECTION REALLY REQUIRE? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
It may be left open whether there are such particular circumstances in the present case, for instance in view of the fact that the auxiliary requests were filed within the time limit fixed pursuant to R 116 and that the independent claims of at least some of the auxiliary requests (1, 2, and 4) are supported by dependent claims as originally filed.This is because a criterion of convergence has to be examined separately for each individual request. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
This implies that Section 31 does not create a vested, indefeasible or absolute right of filing an appeal to this Court against a final order or decision of the Tribunal to this Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
” Firstly, as follows from the above there is no basis for this to be found in the EPC, in particular not in A 116(1) EPC 1973. [2.9] Secondly there was in fact clearly a need for and an entitlement to discussion between the ED and the applicant in this case. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
We'll answer them in an online chat on Tuesday at 1 p.m. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:52 am
But just because a law is in place does not mean a pedestrian can be assured a car will stop. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
Does same-sex marriage have any effect on wider social measures of family intactness? [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
On the contrary, the focus of s. 14.06(8) is related to s. 121(1) – provable claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Basing the choice on the “location” of the maintenance task does not change that. [read post]
