Search for: "Deal v. USA" Results 841 - 860 of 1,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:50 am by Howard Knopf
LSUC in order to extract tens of millions a year from businesses, researchers, taxpayers, educators and students for non-existent rights to non-existent repertoirejust say no to attempts to circumscribe fair dealing that would put Canada at a huge competitive disadvantage to the USA in terms of education, research and innovationjust say no to the injection of the treaty based "three-step test" intended to accomplish the foregoing and undo CCH v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:48 am by Raffaela Wakeman
A few weeks ago, a Seventh Circuit en banc panel held oral arguments in Vance v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by support
The Scion class action lawsuit says that when the defective door handles break, “consumers have been, and will continue to be, forced to deal with an unsafe and illegal situation. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore R 101(2), which authorises correction of deficiencies under R 99(1)(a), can only justify corrections of deficiencies that are directed to completing the appellant’s identity, if this was not fully provided in the notice of appeal, in cases where the appellant is already identifiable from the notice of appeal. [4] The Board has now to look into the case law and consider whether this conclusion […] contradicts the established case law dealing with questions of… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm by Venkat
Obviously it wouldn't make sense for the stories to describe in painful detail the innumerable types of requests an entity such as Twitter receives and how it deals with each of these types of requests, but it was clear after reading these stories that the media didn't have a firm grasp on the contours of Twitter's 'policy'. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
  Specifically, in view of the high costs of litigation, there was pressure from electronics companies to reduce the uncertainties of litigation by clarifying the law in regards to willful infringement and inequitable conduct, eliminating “secret” prior art, and retaining the prior user defense.[1] Additional issues included ensuring patent quality and reducing pendency by increasing third party participation in the issuance of patents, and increasing funding for the United States… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am by war
In finding that there was no infringement, Rares J had to deal with 7 issues. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]