Search for: "Denny's Inc." Results 841 - 860 of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2022, 8:10 am by Dennis Crouch
USA, Inc., 7 F.4th 1320 (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
In a November 14, 2013 decision, Judge Denny Chin (continuing a case in which he presided before joining the Second Circuit) granted summary judgment in favor of Google, Inc in the long-running case by The Authors Guild, Inc. based on the fair use defense to copyright infringement. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 2:06 pm by Mark Astarita
The remaining assets will be liquidated and placed in a fund for distribution to harmed investors.According to the SEC’s order, Dennis Gibb, the owner of Sweetwater Investments Inc., stole more than $3 million from Sweetwater Income Flood LP, a private fund Sweetwater managed, to pay for personal expenses, including his mortgage and car payments, and to keep Sweetwater’s business afloat. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:36 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Journal blasted Spitzer for his prosecution, to which he responded with the allegedly defamatory Slate column entitled They Still Don't Get It in which he defended his pursuit of corporate malfeasance by Marsh and the American Insurance Group, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm by Dan Stein
Myriad Genetics, Inc., has generated widespread coverage. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:17 am by Carey, Danis & Lowe
This included the newborn twins of actor Dennis Quaid, who eventually sued Baxter. [read post]
27 May 2012, 3:42 pm
” After an extensive investigation on the practices of Demco Express, the FMCSA applied the cease-operations order to Demco Express, Demco Trans, Inc., and company owner Denny Mekenye. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:09 pm by Jason Rantanen
Note: Thanks to Dennis and Tim for contributions to this post. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:51 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch A highlight of this opinion is Footnote 1 of Judge Moore's dissenting opinion that states "The majority baldly asserts that issues of patent ownership and inventorship are not sufficiently grand for the Supreme Court to resolve in the first instance. [read post]