Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
The core vision of FLIA is to promote international cooperation and public dialogue through the development of new ideas and collaboration with various academic, governmental and civil society actors. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
Burgueno v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
" Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
We note that: 1) the sheer magnitude of a cyber-attack exacts a calamitous injury of risk and tumult, far more penetrating than for instance, a financial reporting mishap; and 2) the rising morass of regulatory attention on cyber-attacks has begun to surpass governmental attention on corporate financial reporting. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:52 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
The transcript does not indicate the presence of any unnecessary individuals during the conversation between Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
As the Supreme Court put it: “Congressional pronouncements, though instructive as to matters within Congress’ authority to address . . . , are not dispositive of Amtrak’s status as a governmental entity for purposes of separation of powers analysis under the Constitution. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
As the Supreme Court put it: “Congressional pronouncements, though instructive as to matters within Congress’ authority to address . . . , are not dispositive of Amtrak’s status as a governmental entity for purposes of separation of powers analysis under the Constitution. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
As the Supreme Court put it: “Congressional pronouncements, though instructive as to matters within Congress’ authority to address . . . , are not dispositive of Amtrak’s status as a governmental entity for purposes of separation of powers analysis under the Constitution. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:51 am
Article I similarly devolves federal functions on state legislatures and officials, sometimes as governmental entities and sometimes not. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
” Gertz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am
CSIRO v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:55 pm
When a person files a lawsuit against another person, business, or governmental entity seeking payment of medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages resulting from an accident such as a car wreck, the case usually proceeds through a phase called “discovery. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
On the other hand, while Bluman recognizes the right of governmental entities to protect themselves from foreign influence, it does not suggest that such insulation is constitutionally required. [read post]
