Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 841 - 860 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by Kelly
General Global pharmaceutical linkage regulations: A consortium framework (IP Osgoode) Pfizer rolling out generics to grab off-patent market (GenericsWeb) Australia: Too little too late: CSL Limited v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (No 2) and the judicial discretion to amend a patent (IP Whiteboard) Brazil: You lost your chance! [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
Sullivan-type protection, if it does? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
SULLIVAN, J., concurs with opinion: I concur but with respect to Part I would go a step further than does the majority holding that the instruction in question was harmless error. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Mary Sullivan
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]