Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 841 - 860 of 3,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here are some of the highlights: Pandemic-Related Issues 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:07 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  When used properly, car safety seats can reduce the risk of death by 70% in infants under 1 year of age and 54% in children in the 1 to 4 age range. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Patricia Hughes
., at paras. 1 to 4 for greater detail about the requirements.) [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:40 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Next, at point 55, the Court acknowledges the two sets of criteria used in its case-law in order to characterize whether or not an action is covered by the concept of ‘civil or commercial matter’ within the meaning of Article 1(1) of the Brussels I bis Regulation. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am by Matthias Weller
To cut it short: mutual trust does not (fully) trump human rights – “no blind trust” (Koen Lenaerts, La vie après l’avis: Exploring the principle of mutual (yet not blind) trust, Common Market Law Review 54 (2017), pp. 805 et seq.). [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 8:52 am by Kristen Lee
Though residents of congregate care facilities account for only 1 percent of the U.S. population, 50 percent of all COVID-19-related deaths have occurred in those facilities. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:31 am by Martin A. Schwartz
A response that borrowers may shop for a lender that does not require dual collateral may become illusory, just as attempting to obtain a commercial loan without some form of carveout or bad-boy guaranty has become. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:00 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Practice in Lower Court Decision Making,” 54 Wm. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
The LIHTC has subsidized over 3 million housing units since it was established in 1986, the largest source of affordable housing financing.[1] According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the LIHTC costs the government an average of $8 billion in forgone revenue each year.[2] Research indicates that LIHTC developers produce “housing units that are an estimated 20 percent more expensive per square foot than average industry estimates. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 10:00 am by Jonathan G. Odom
As indicated by the citations included within this passage, my particular counterargument was based on the “ordinary meaning” of the “terms of the treaty,” as is required by Article 31(1) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
  Anti-discrimination legislation generally does not apply to the right of consumers to decide to buy or not to buy goods from a particular territory. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Supreme Court has had the occasion to consider when a contract of adhesion is unconscionable.[1] In doing so the Court asserts its ability to apply equitable considerations in cases of unconscionable contracts and should bring caution to the minds of all contract drafters so that their terms are communicated better and onerous terms or outcomes are brought to the attention of the vulnerable party. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
& Loan Ass’n, 538 So. 2d 867, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the First District Court of Appeal adopted the majority rule that the specification of the amount of credit to be extended, in the absence of expression of a contrary intent, only limits the guarantor’s liability and does not create a condition. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
& Loan Ass’n, 538 So. 2d 867, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the First District Court of Appeal adopted the majority rule that the specification of the amount of credit to be extended, in the absence of expression of a contrary intent, only limits the guarantor’s liability and does not create a condition. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
& Loan Ass’n, 538 So. 2d 867, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the First District Court of Appeal adopted the majority rule that the specification of the amount of credit to be extended, in the absence of expression of a contrary intent, only limits the guarantor’s liability and does not create a condition. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The answer is that it does still apply; it just weighs differently in the balance. [read post]