Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
Indeed, the UK’s argument received short shrift; see paragraph 93 to 96. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Once this evidence is available, post-published evidence may be taken into account to back up these findings (see decision T 609/02 [9]). [5] The application does not provide any experimental data proving that an adenovirus of claim 1 is able to replicate in cells having an activated Ras-pathway but not in normal cells. [read post]
5 May 2016, 10:13 am
For any Medicare patient who does not meet the patient-level clinical criteria, the LTCH will be paid a lower “site neutral” payment rate, which will be the lower of (1) the IPPS comparable per diem payment rate including any outlier payments, or (2) 100% of the estimated costs for services. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
96% takedown rate with Google, and 4% are those weren’t ever indexed. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
His response brief does not raise any cross-points or challenge any finding of fact or conclusion of law. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
[The patent proprietor] also noted that after grant, i.e. during opposition proceedings, divisional applications could not be filed. [1.7] The board does not find these arguments convincing. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
The record does not include a reporter’s transcript of the hearing. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
The record does not include a reporter’s transcript of the hearing. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
" Orascom and Natgasoline filed a response asserting that appellate jurisdiction exists because this case involves (1) an appeal from a final judgment; or (2) a statutorily authorized interlocutory appeal; or (3) a mandamus proceeding. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
Moreover, this limitation does not change the factual situation but only concentrates it on the use of a group of compounds encompassing the preferred embodiment DOP. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
As a consequence, the LBA considers that it has to examine its competence.[4] The impugned decision does not explicitly mention the applicable provisions of the EPC. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
See Haygood, 17 So. 3d at 895-96. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
The offer letter clearly states "How to accept this offer" and lists two requirements: (1) signing and returning the Modification Agreement by December 31, 2013 a [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
The book is organized around two major questions: 1. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 2:47 pm
Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 96-325-XIE2007000. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
Ct. 2675, 2695-96, 186 L. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 3:00 pm
Eagerton (1983) 462 U.S. 176, 195-96, 103 S. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
Ct. 2675, 2695-96, 186 L. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
But what does this actually mean? [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
It is important to bear in mind that COBRA itself does not have a specific preemption provision. [read post]
