Search for: "Duncan v. Duncan*"
Results 841 - 860
of 967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81]) As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a new cause of … [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
We posted previously on Grant and Gleaves v MOD , giving a summary of the claims and the circumstances of the claimants. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:49 pm
This question was answered by the Hague Court of Appeal on 2 November 2010 in GlaxoSmithKline v Pharmachemie (a member of the Teva group). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:21 pm
These numbers come, of course, from Judge VanDyke's dissent in Duncan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 10:46 am
Today, in Consumers' Research v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:00 am
And we should hear soon from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which heard argument in April in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 8:43 pm
The first case (Macki v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:03 am
" Erdman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/VHJMLy (Mikki Tomlinson) Reports and ResourcesCanadian eDiscovery Case Law Digests – Common Law - http://bit.ly/UEJMX6 (Peg Duncan) Disclosure and Discovery in Utah – http://bit.ly/Uy1vzC (Utah Courts) Ethics of Twitter Research: Topology of Disciplines, Methods and Ethics Review Boards – http://bit.ly/UzhU6Y (Nick Proferes, Michael Zimmer) November Edition of Notable Cases and Events in #eDiscovery (PDF) http://bit.ly/RTr5Sl (Sidley Austin)… [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2024, 9:18 am
In April 2023, after 600 hours of work, Duncan reported that he believed a new trial was necessary because Glossip had been deprived of a fair trial. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Strawn v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The view of the learned editors of Duncan & Neill (Duncan and Neil on Defamation (Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2009), at 17.26. is that it can but the better view, which was assumed to be the case by at least two of their lordships in Reynolds (at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) is that it cannot. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
See Rowen v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
However, in 2006 in Blank v. [read post]
