Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 841 - 860
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
The parties accepted this construction and Lord Carnwath observed at para 20 that the French and Spanish versions are equally authentic to the English text. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
That is the issue which the English Court of Appeal recently faced in VTB Capital Plc v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
Despite the differences in approach, the Jones v Tsige case is of considerable interest to English lawyers. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
In doing so, he turns to the 1765 English case of Entick v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Regarding mutuality, the Order states: “In light of [AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
On the same day that the Court issued its ruling in the California case, it also issued its opinion in a case called United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:58 pm
Cooke J held that the arbitration agreement was to be governed by English law. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:59 am
See Bader v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:24 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:40 am
Kentucky courts provide state-funded translators throughout all court proceedings for criminal defendants who don't understand English. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
One of the best known judgment in the English speaking world is Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
One of the best known judgment in the English speaking world is Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
Rule 45, para 1 enables the governor of the prison to arrange for the prisoner to be segregated and para 2 states that the prisoner shall not be segregated for more than 72 hours without the authority of the Secretary of State and the authority given shall be for a period not exceeding 14 days. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
