Search for: "English v. English" Results 841 - 860 of 9,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:28 am
The case of Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F v CPT Empresas Maritimas S.A. [2011] EWHC 589 (Admlty) concerned whether the agreement between the claimant's insured and the defendant was subject to a set of standard terms which incorporated an English arbitration clause. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  But as the recent decision of the English High Court in Chantiers de l’Atlantique S.A. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm by Thomas Heintzman
  But as the recent decision of the English High Court in Chantiers de l’Atlantique S.A. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:46 pm by Samuel Bray
Those involved in debates on statutory interpretation should make themselves familiar with his case comment on Pepper v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 6:47 am
  But Holst had wide interests and sympathies, not least sharing V-W's affection for English folk songs and dances, and for reviving the music of old English composers, and those interests come together on this recording. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
Earlier this month, His Honor Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) issued his ruling in Fromageries Bel SA v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (Ch), confirming the 'Babybel cheese' 3D trade mark could not survive an application for a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 7:44 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Like Prudence the heroine of Amours à l’Italienne (Rome Adventure in English), UPC local division of Mannheim gives us a lesson in polyamory in the first UPC FRAND decision (November, 22, 2024, Panasonic v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Marty Lederman
  See, e.g., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
 In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:59 am by traceydennis
Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13; [2010] WLR (D) 71 “An English court considering under Pt III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 whether it would be appropriate to make an order for financial relief on the application of a party to a foreign divorce was not required to apply a forum non conveniens test and decide which of two jurisdictions was the appropriate one. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
(United States v Desmond (1982) 670 Fed. 2nd 414, 420) The judgment is affirmed. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm by charonqc
  I think there should be a class action to sue the English FA for misrepresentation, deception, passing off and, indeed, badly and perhaps we could even chuck in a bit of nervous shock mixed with  Rylands v Fletcher. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:49 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had previously noted a recent judgement of the English Court of Appeal in Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 638 (16 May 2012). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
See Case C-131/12: Google Spain SL & Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) & Mario Costeja González. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
That is the issue which the English Court of Appeal recently faced in VTB Capital Plc v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 11:09 am
Summary judgement against distributors of conditional access cards to obtain access to foreign broadcasts was refused in an English Court hearing (Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure and others [2008] EWHC 44 (Ch)) a couple of weeks ago. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
  This could not be satisfied on the facts, because the 'third party' is the EPO/English Court, and there was no question of their "freedom to deal" with the English health authorities being affected. [read post]