Search for: "English v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
What this means in plain English is that when you file the EEOC charge, the statute of limitations on the state claims continues to run. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
  In Alsugair, the defendant “was charged with wire fraud in a scheme to defraud English skills testing services by allowing imposters to take English tests for foreign students” under a statute that “made it a crime to engage in a scheme to obtain money or property by false pretenses. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
 It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:50 pm
In Allianz Insurance Co Egypt v Aigaion Insurance Co SA [2008] EWHC 1127 (Comm), the English High Court was asked to examine the effect of the term "Deffered [sic] Premium Clause" in the reinsurance slip and to ascertain whether its inclusion was so uncertain as to be of no contractual effect and to make the whole contract ineffective.Allianz alleged that Aigaion had agreed to reinsure 30 percent of the cover provided by Allianz in respect of a fleet of tugs. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm by anbrandon
It reversed and remanded to the district court.Lobbins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:13 am by Jon Gelman
English: United States Supreme Court building in Washington D.C., USA. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:28 pm
This can happen with foreign language documents, especially when the English translation is not available. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this convention, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V If the person claimed is under prosecution, either in the United States or Haiti, for any other crime than that upon which the demand for extradition is based, the extradition shall be postponed until the judgment is pronounced, and, if the person is convicted, until the sentence imposed is fully served or remitted. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Velte, Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop V. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is now indisputable that consent is a subjective state of mind, entirely personal to the complainant. [read post]