Search for: "FORD v. UNITED STATES" Results 841 - 860 of 1,123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm by Marcia Oddi
Ford Motor Company, Justice Dickson writes:The United States District... [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:48 pm by almaraz
United States * Former President of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund * Counsel to the Warren Commission Mr. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-341Issue(s): (1) Whether the Federal Circuit erred by creating a defense to breach of the implied contractual duties under the sovereign acts doctrine that is at odds with the two-part test established by this Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
(IP tango) CASA CLUB TV: Chile Supreme Court rules (IP tango) China Did BAIC know it was joyriding with Ford’s trade secrets? [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Mandelman
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by CSL Library News
Solicitor General, judge and vice president of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:25 am by Jeffrey
Next week could initiate the foreclosure of the class-action system as we know it, because that's when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will hear arguments in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]