Search for: "FRAME v FRAME" Results 841 - 860 of 8,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2007, 4:42 am
A computer glitch is law office failure.The First Department vacated the default of defendant-law office, in Lancer Insurance v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
S.]Looks like they didn’t treat that kid so well, either.# # #DECISIONB. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the inmate says that jail officials in Connecticut had a policy of requiring inmates with disciplinary problems to be handcuffed behind their backs during their out-of-cell recreational periods.The case is Gardner v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
In Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai'i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Unknown
""Framing the 'Refugee Hunter': Gender and Nationalist Perspectives on Border Vigilance in Bulgaria," Conflict and Society, vol. 8, no. 1 (2022) [open access]"Humanitarian diplomacy as Turkey’s national role conception and performance: evidence from Somalia and Afghanistan," Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Latest Articles, 7 Oct. 2022 [full-text via CMI]"'Our home, your home? [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals applies this rule to an inmate who in the past has brought frivolous lawsuits.The case is Akassy v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Assn. v M.https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_04835.htm [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:14 pm
Amy Salyzyn, Yale University Law School, is publishing John Rambo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
Ross (Cumberland School of Law, Samford University) reviews Marc Lendler, Gitlow v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Ryan Mulvey
[FOIA Advisor reported on the issuance of the decision discussed in this article, Baker v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
”Since GR was unable to satisfy these elements and failed (among other things) to show that NYCHA had “actual knowledge of the facts,” within the governing 90-day window -- a factor which the AD2 considered to be of “`great importance’” -- the appellate court concluded that the application for additional time had thus been correctly denied.Bet that didn’t escape notice ….# # # DECISIONMatter of G.R. v New York City Hous. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 5:04 am by Jon Hyman
According to Victoria Zetwick, a county correctional office and the plaintiff in Zetwick v. [read post]