Search for: "Fordham v. Fordham"
Results 841 - 860
of 974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
" The lawsuits include Turek v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:11 am
Scalia, however, said that the law could not remedy this (which is almost a direct quote from Plessy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end:… [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Dragon) EU: Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual Property Watch) (Patenting Lives) EU: Fordham IP conference: EU pharma sector enquiry slammed (Managing Intellectual Property) Hungary: Board of Appeal: Medical preparations not similar to cosmetics (International Law Office) India: The ‘Mashelkar Committee Report’ on pharma patenting resurfaces! [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Well, I can happily report there was no conspiracy at Fordham, just plenty of shared ideas and a whole heap of merriment! [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
In Mazur v. eBay, eBay represented that a third party service was "safe. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 7:38 am
Bidder's Edge or Intel v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:19 pm
See Weld v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 3:11 am
One notable example is Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
Reardon, partners at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, discuss three of the Court's recent decisions: in Helmsley-Spear Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:18 pm
William Michael Treanor, Fordham University School of Law, has posted a paper on Marbury v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Pietrangelo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:21 am
Vázquez (Georgetown Univ. - Law), "'Not a Happy Precedent': The Story of Ex parte Quirin"February 6, 2009: Thomas H. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
J. 1435 (2008) (with Alexandra Kalev) * Insular Individualism: Employment Discrimination Law After Ledbetter v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 2177, 2008. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:57 am
"
OUTSIDE COUNSEL:
Wage Deductions: Labor Law §193, 'Pachter v. [read post]
