Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2009, 7:36 pm
The brief argues:In the opinion below, the Florida Supreme Court departed from long-established state law protecting the property rights of beachfront landowners. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:08 pm
October 8, 2007:The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati granted the government's request for a full-panel hearing in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:43 am
United States, was also the first time Kavanaugh took the bench with his new colleagues. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:35 pm
The Appeals Court cites: Buckhannon Bd. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:24 am
Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Solis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm
The next day, the Department of Justice sent a Rule 28(j) letter to the United States Fifth Circuit, informing it of the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
Thus, while the January 7 arguments might trigger multiple opinions from the Court, the Justices’ decision to grant or deny stays will not be a final decision as to the lawfulness of the mandates. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 2:10 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994). [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
This matter, styled United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:46 pm
Holder; Mendiola v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Imprecision aside, Justice Potter Stewart, who joined the majority in Furman, boldly predicted that “the death penalty in the United States was finished. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm
Manuel v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
Justice Alito dissented from the denial of certiorari in that case; the Chief Justice and Justice Scalia joined his dissent. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that Congress left a discrete authority in the Department of Justice (DOJ) when transferring functions to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that Congress left a discrete authority in the Department of Justice (DOJ) when transferring functions to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
As Lynn explained, tippees essentially inherit the duties of insiders from whom they receive MNPI, and have the same potential liability as insiders.The decision resolved a circuit split arising from United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Yates, the Justice Department was not even permitted to defend the order. [read post]
