Search for: "Gange v. Gange"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2017, 9:50 am
Texas and Texas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
The People v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Millender (Relisted after the 5/12 and 5/19 Conferences) Docket: 10-704 Issue(s): (1) Whether police officers are entitled to qualified immunity when they obtained a facially valid warrant to search for firearms, firearm-related materials, and gang-related items in the residence of a gang member and felon who had threatened to kill his girlfriend and fired a sawed-off shotgun at her? [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
(Again, shades of Cole v Whitfield!) [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
(Again, shades of Cole v Whitfield!) [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
These men displayed P-9 gang signs and swerved near the curb as they passed by. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:49 am
Ohio, Texas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:49 am
Ohio, Texas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Monday in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:53 am
Stanley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
” Watford v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:39 pm
While fighting economic crime and gang activity has no obvious connection to automobile defects, at least one can argue that these programs are beneficial to the public at large. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 7:42 pm
The Supreme Court ruled the practice unconstitutional in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:50 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:46 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 9:08 am
The California Court of Appeal for the Second District said no in O.G. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
In Messerschmitt, the Justices are considering immunity for police officers with an over-broad warrant executing a search for guns and evidence of gang activity. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm
First, the result of the much criticised but still applicable “Rule in Bonnard v Perryman [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
