Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
United States, No. 17-9082, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm
& Elliott, Inc. (1997), United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:42 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg supports abortion rights because she believes abortion rights are necessary for women to achieve political, economic and social equality in the United States and because she believes the equal protection clause prohibits states from passing laws that prevent any group from achieving political, economic and social equality. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am
United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), and Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 1:28 pm
Never before has the United States had such a long-term vacancy. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
[6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The conservative members of the Supreme Court edged closer to eliminating the separation of church and state in the Court’s recent decision American Legion v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Turning to the district court’s conclusion that the 2010 map also had a discriminatory effect, the challengers assert that several justices specifically envisioned an inquiry into whether a redistricting plan had a discriminatory effect in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
"), United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:23 pm
There was no POTUS v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
In sequel to McGirt, justices will again review scope of state prosecutorial power in Indian country
26 Apr 2022, 10:06 am
Those cases, led by United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am
United States and “clarify that acquitted conduct sentencing is unjust and unconstitutional. [read post]
