Search for: "HARPER v. STATE"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Shipley, Conflicts Between Copyright and the First Amendment After Harper & Row, Publishers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Harper, No. 05-10247 "A conviction and defendants' sentences for conspiracy, drug possession, and weapons offenses are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) admitting testimonial hearsay; 2) excluding the conviction records of a critical state witness; 3) refusing to ask requested voir dire questions of the jury; 4) using a conviction in this case as a prior conviction for purposes of sentence enhancement; and 5) imposing an unreasonable sentence. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
To frame that discussion, I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
Sander v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
It also means, however, that the AP sees the lead as the classic "heart of the work," (as in Harper & Row v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:11 am
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
I am writing, of course, about National Federation of Businesses v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:51 am
Sander v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:29 pm
In February, the firm filed a suit in the Southern District of New York asserting that the Hearst Corporation illegally employed hundreds of unpaid interns in violation of federal and state wage law (Wang v The Hearst Corporation, No. 12 Civ. 0793). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
Raguin v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:40 pm
Not valid in all 50 states. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
Hansen In White v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
To frame that discussion, I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
To frame that discussion, I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
A former Harper’s Bazaar intern filed suit, claiming that she regularly worked more than 40 hours per week at the magazine, and sometimes as many as 55 hours per week, without compensation. [read post]
