Search for: "HARPER v. STATE" Results 841 - 860 of 1,026
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm by Marie Louise
Harmonix patent dispute (Patent Arcade) LG – ALJ Gildea issues initial determination in certain video displays (337-TA-687) (ITC Law Blog) Toshiba – ALJ Rogers denies respondents’ motions for reconsideration in Certain Notebook Computer Products (337-TA-705) (ITC Law Blog)   US Copyright Bill would give Justice Department power to shutter piracy sites worldwide (ArsTechnica) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (TorrentFreak) (Technollama)… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Mandatory minimum -- Armed Career Criminal Act -- Predicate convictions -- Prior felony possession of short-barreled shotgun was not violent felony under ACCA -- District court properly declined to sentence defendant under ACCAUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:43 pm by Ryan Radia
As the 4th Circuit concluded in its forceful 1997 opinion in Zeran v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm by Keith Lee
Harper over at Belly of the Beast: The lawyers in Perdue v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm by Marie Louise
Summery but not so summary: EWCA (Civ) decision in trade mark infringement case Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein (IPKat) Nokia fakes case: silence over official submission (IPKat) UK’s Digital Economy Act hurts digital technology development (ipeg)   United States US Patents Did the lack of software savvy patent attorneys cause a decline in patent quality? [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:02 am by John Steele
A new Texas appellate decision, Inliner Americas v. [read post]