Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 841 - 860
of 5,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
The first one, Harris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
On January 22, 1973, Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
Harris. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 7:17 am
Harris argues that foreign states are not persons. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Harris v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:45 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports [2011] EWHC 1184 (Ch) (11 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) MJN v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 1192 (QB) (11 May 2011) Clynes v O’ Connor [2011] EWHC 1201 (QB) (13 May 2011) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Harry Yearsley Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1160 (TCC) (12 May 2011) Source:… [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:53 am
Since the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:26 am
Today's decision in Scott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:23 pm
Ctr. a/a/o Jamel Harris v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 6:34 pm
LEXIS 155 (NJ App., Jan. 22, 2019), a New Jersey state appellate court rejected an argument from an inmate convicted of murdering a former girlfriend that the divorce obtained by his wife was invalid because under Catholic doctrine a marriage cannot be dissolved by any earthly authority.In Harris v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 8:08 am
In Hammock v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:13 pm
Harris will "state the facts" in some case and then, without giving me a full opportunity to wake fully, demanding to know why I agree or disagree with the decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:09 am
Intel Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 3:17 am
She’s couching this procedural coup as related only to imposing a national abortion law on all 50 states. [read post]
