Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE" Results 841 - 860 of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson and Lord Hughes. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
  My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Hughes v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
 Also at Public Books is a review of Benjamin Peters' How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet.A Fiery and Furious People: a History of Violence in England by James Sharpe is reviewed in The Times Literary Supplement and the New Statesman.Mary Beard discusses her SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome in the Los Angeles Review of Books.Cornelia Hughes Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Case Law, Australia: Bleyer v Google Inc, “Search results” libel action stayed as “disproportionate” – Hugh Tomlinson QC [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Woodard, which involves a strip-search of a preschool child by a state caseworker. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
  It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Our post the other day on Wolicki-Gables v. [read post]