Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 841 - 860 of 974
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2009, 1:59 pm by Davis Wright Tremaine
Authored by: Jim Greenfield and Clayton Graham This week, the Division One Court of Appeals filed its opinion in the case of Connor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:45 pm by David Kopel
On March 2, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
March Joint Powers Authority (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1135, the court addressed whether the approval of a Design Plan Application was ministerial or discretionary. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Senate and House bills capping carbon dioxide emissions would reduce them by 17 to 20 percent by 2020, compared with 2005 levels. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
No.34-2008-00015011-CU-OR-GDS)APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Loren E. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
The following NJ criminal conviction appeals were decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court and the New Jersey Superior Court - Appellate Division in October. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Click Here Court orders will force homeowners in nine East Bay cities to fix or replace sewer lines at sale, upgrade. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am by Fred Goldsmith
The district court further stated it would dismiss Willis' Complaint unless Willis amended it to include the necessary factual specificity to support his FELA claim.Pennsylvania Superior Court: Upholds $3.15 Million Verdict to Amtrak LinemanIn Callahan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:44 pm
The volume of ICBC and other personal injury cases released by our Superior Courts over the past 2 days has been higher than usual so I present today’s BC Injury Law Update in a ‘round up‘ fashion. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
The Court of Appeal disagreed: Airbus v Patel [1997] 2 Lloyds Rep 8; but then the House of Lords agreed with Colman J, holding in effect that the English courts should not act as the world's policemen where a non-contractual anti-suit injunction was sought, as this would be contrary to the principle of comity: Airbus v Patel [1999] 1 AC 119. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
  That is what the court said in the Delfino case that Professor Goldman mentions (Delfino v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
R (Gebremarium) v City of Westminster [2009] EWHC 2254 (Admin) Thanks to the Garden Court housing bulletin for pointing to this one. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Nonetheless, the Justice Department disagrees with Lamberth’s decision, calling it in a court filing “an unprecedented departure from the Executive’s exclusive authority to control access to classified information. [read post]