Search for: "I v. B" Results 841 - 860 of 27,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2017, 3:18 am
Notwithstanding my three-decades-plus of experience, I've rarely been as disgusted with the underlying facts of a case as by those alleged in Christopher Brummer, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:40 am
I think not, and I therefore think that the Court's test must fail. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
Lest the result be a published opinion that (a) affirms, (b) lets everyone in the world know that I not only lost, and (c) tells everyone that I didn't even repay my student loans. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:32 am by gmlevine
I mentioned two instances in Friday’s Note where respondents were obviously targeting the complainant’s trademark, passing off for advertising and phishing. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 1:58 am by Dave
In R(B) v Redbridge LBC [2019] EWHC 250 (Admin), Jeremy Johnson QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge, was required to adjudicate on what is, as far as I am concerned, a really important point of practice, given the nature and continuing obligations of suitability of accommodation in homelessness cases, and the increasing number of suitability reviews (especially following the 2017 Act). [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:29 am by Rohini Kurup, Katherine Pompilio
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) prevents federal courts from reviewing factual findings in cases to determine if noncitizens will be deported or granted permission to remain in the United States. [read post]