Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY." Results 841 - 860 of 1,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by Barry Barnett
  The MDL process creates more uncertainty due to the weight the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation[3] gives to parties’ preferences; individual judges’ case loads, experience, and willingness to take on extra work; the locations of grand juries; and other factors that don’t often figure into regular motions to transfer venue. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:10 am by Mike Scarcella
But Cooke also noted secrecy is no longer necessary when the contents of grand jury matters have become public. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am by Susan Brenner
Under Rule 6(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, “matter[s] occurring before the grand jury” must be kept secret, subject to certain exceptions spelled out in other parts of Rule 6. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
JAMES: In one of the Manhunter comics, Manhunter's alter ego, Kate Spencer, who is a criminal defense attorney, is at a grand jury hearing. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:53 am by Jeremy Saland
Rosas, he likely had no other choice but to present the matter to a Grand Jury to make the charging decision - and it did just that. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:53 am by Jeremy Saland
Rosas, he likely had no other choice but to present the matter to a Grand Jury to make the charging decision - and it did just that. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:51 pm by Cathy Ritterbusch
   Specifically, the media shows a lawyer parading in front of a jury, pounding on a lectern and giving a grand oratory performance. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:26 pm
Unlike a trial, the grand jury's proceedings are secret; neither the subject of the grand jury proceedings, nor his attorney, is generally present for witness testimony. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm by Rick
As the story proceeded, I learned that the potential client had already spilled her guts to the po-po. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:46 pm by Matt Johnston
 But getting such a court order is not a simple or necessarily short matter. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:14 am by Lewis Gainor
This statute applies not to judicial proceedings, but rather to any proceeding before an administrative agency, department, or committee of the United State, including Congress. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
Based on this, the record supports the jury’s findings on aggravating factors for sentencing. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
., which may have already empanelled a grand jury in Virginia, prosecute him as a criminal under the Espionage Act of 1917 or under the computer fraud and abuse act? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am by Stanley D. Radtke, Esq.
Citing the Fifth Amendment, all 14 are refusing to testify before the grand jury, which they say is a secretive arm of a government intent on silencing critics. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am by Marvin Ammori
., which may have already empanelled a grand jury in Virginia, prosecute him as a criminal under the Espionage Act of 1917 or under the computer fraud and abuse act? [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
Therefore, as a matter of apparent first impression, the District Court of Appeal held that the defendant was not a "wrongfully incarcerated person" entitled to compensation under the Victims of Wrongful Incarceration Compensation Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
In so doing, the trial judge failed to comply with a revised supreme court rule concerning voir dire which had taken effect just two weeks before. [read post]