Search for: "John Doe, II"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
His dissent was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas and by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
Concurrence II: This is kind of like a refusal-of-medical-treatment case. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:30 pm
[Ed.: Thanks commenter John F. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:39 am
The late Carl Sagan once asked this question, “What does it mean for a civilization to be a million years old? [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:28 am
Two Republican members John Ring and Marvin Kaplan agreed the case should be dismissed on constitutional grounds, but opined that the Board’s precedents improperly narrowed the NLRA’s protections of neutral businesses against coercion. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
II: Prime Minister and After 1957-66 (Macmllan), edited by Peter Catterall. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
Schwinn, an associate professor of law at the John Marshall Law School in Chicago and co-editor of the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[ii] Concepcion, 131 S. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[ii] Michigan v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:35 pm
" You get the feeling you're reading a treatment for the next John Grisham novel, with Matt Damon and Chris O'Donnell (as Newmark and Buckmaster) already signed for the movie. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[ii] 3. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
" Now, it does not seem particularly convenient to use three terms as a substitute for two. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:32 pm
This is great news, and an implicit acknowledgment by top Democratic leaders that the FCC most certainly does not have the authority to move forward unilaterally with regulatory proposals such as Net neutrality mandates or Title II reclassification efforts. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
Involve the compensation committee in reviewing the disclosure (or any conclusion that no disclosure is required), even though this does not relate only to executive compensation. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
But it does have some interesting tidbits in it, like the agreements with Chief Executive Isaac Perlmutter, CFO Kenneth West, and EVP John Turitzin that appear to make it harder for the three executives to invoke the “good reason” clause in their respective employment contracts and collect lots of money like most other executives of companies that have been taken over do. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:20 pm
But John McCain voted against banning torture by the CIA: Senator McCain rightly insists that the U.S. may not (i) torture; (ii) engage in cruel treatment prohibited by Common Article 3; or (iii) engage in conduct that shocks the conscience, under the McCain Amendment. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
While the article does not focus on CAFA, the author does believe that CAFA lessened the attractiveness of the class action to the plaintiffs’ bar. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:07 pm
Telemedicine and Employers: The New Frontier – Washington D.C. attorneys René Quashie and Amy Lerman of Epstein Becker Green’s TechHealth Perspectives Supreme Court Rejects Notice and Comment Rulemaking Requirement for Agency Interpretations – Chicago’s Doug Hass, associate at Franczek Radelet on their blog Wage & Hour Insights UAS: Secret Service Declares War on Drones – Northern Virginia lawyer Mark McKinnon of McKenna Long & Aldridge for the… [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
