Search for: "Jordan v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 1,803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that in Collins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley
Jordan & DupreeIn 2011, The Supreme Court held in Ortiz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am by Emily Dai
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
United States when reading laws about computers. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
The Court expressly stated that it was not ruling on this question in its 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly JR (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) was heard on 15 November 2018. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Woodard, which involves a strip-search of a preschool child by a state caseworker. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” Prosecutorial Accountability questions “some claims made by Oregon and Louisiana” in Ramos v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck looks at Dalmazzi v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jordan, 2014 BCCA 241 (36068) Nov. 27, 2014 Is a 32.5 month delay constitutional. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Massachusetts Issue: Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]