Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY" Results 841 - 860 of 1,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am by Paul Horwitz
Unsurprisingly, the Court offers little real guidance here. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
 Plus, there's the little matter of the fact that the panel thinks that this defendant should already be in prison. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:54 am by Ryan Scoville
Second, there’s a tension between forum non and choice of law doctrine that makes it a little awkward to raise the issues simultaneously. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:30 pm by Tom Smith
Indeed, that’s what Congress did with respect to Exchanges established by U.S. territories. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
Hi Hotel paid 2,500 euro for the photographs, following receipt of an invoice that stated, a little mysteriously, ‘include the rights — only for the hotel hi’. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
The proposition being debated was whether in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and the ongoing Actavis v Eli Lilly case we were seeing a Dutch-style territorial grab for jurisdiction or that in the words of one clever barrister a "phantom menace"? [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
This can be increased to 1.5 days “if circumstances justify it,” unless a person is detained pre-sentence because of his or her criminal record, or due to criminal behaviour while on bail.In R. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 3:37 pm by Barry Sookman
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd v Nicastro131 S.Ct. 2780 (2011), Football Dataco Ltd. v Sportradar GmbH, Case C‑173/11, 18 October, 2012. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  So we have exhaustion in theory but in practice a retailer can prevent it.Dorpan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 7:29 am by Katherine A. Campbell
Judgment in the Court of Appeal case of Pillar Denton v Game Retail- about rent due during the administration of Game was handed down yesterday. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm by Ilya Shapiro
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Meanwhile, he's a little puzzled that this issue was not explicitly addressed at the time of the agreement since it's not exactly a novel point. [read post]