Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 841 - 860
of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm
Blaustein v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:06 am
Lord Justice Jackson, giving the leading judgment in the case of Pankhurst v White [2010] EWCA Civ 1445, described the claimant's solicitors' funding arrangement as “grotesque”. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In Moses v Macferlan, Lord Mansfield used money had and received, a common law money count, to provide relief in a case where an action’s outcome failed to align with the actor’s intention. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Lord Neuberger was first to respond. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
On Tuesday 6 December 2011 the Privy Council will hear David Gopaul on behalf of HV Holdings Ltd v Vitra Imam Baksh on behalf of the Incorporated Trustees of the Presbyterian Church of Trinidad and Tobago, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Walker, Brown and Wilson. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
He stated (at paragraph 39) that: "the only principle to be extracted from Payne v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
R (on the application of M) (FC) (Respondent) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 is a House of Lords case concerning Local Authority obligations under the National Assistance Act 1948, and specifically when the authority is obliged to arrange and pay for accommodation. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Rather than using the tests established in Gilbert which were applied in the previous decisions, Lord Sumption amalgamated tests used in various Scottish cases, including Bank of Scotland v Assessor for Edinburgh [1891] 18 R 936, Burn Steward Distillers plc v Lanarkshire Valuation Joint Board [2001] RA 110 and University of Glasgow v Assessor for Glasgow [1952] SC 504 to come up with a three pronged approach comprised of the key principles of (1) geography… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Stangroom & Anor v Brown [2012] EWCA Civ 424 (04 April 2012) Foley Independent News & Media Ltd & Ors v Lord Ashcroft KCMG [2012] EWCA Civ 423 (04 April 2012) Salimi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 422 (04 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jeeg Global Ltd v Hare [2012] EWHC 871 (QB) (04 April 2012) Burn & Ors… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:30 am
Despite the clarity of Shadwell’s ruling, it was ultimately overturned when the decision was appealed to Lord Chancellor Cottenham. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
By a 3-2 majority their Lordships (Lords Hope, Carswell and Brown) held that she was not habitually resident (Baroness Hale and Lord Neuberger dissenting). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:53 am
In Xodus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
See Melchiorre v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
The Outer House decision In 2012, after proof, the Lord Ordinary, Lord Tyre, held that some degree of liability on the part of the Mr Murray had been established (Jackson v Murray [2012] CSOH 100). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
In Courtroom 1 this morning until Tuesday 10 July 2012 is the appeal of BCL Old Co Ltd & ors v BASF plc & ors, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke, and Wilson. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Returning to Khuja, the majority took the view that A v BBC turned on very particular facts and did not represent a departure from the approach taken in Re S and Re Guardian News and Media, which was endorsed in A v BBC [28]. [read post]
