Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 841 - 860 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm by David Ettinger
  Following an unusually heavy calendar last week, the court will hear a total of another 25 arguments — 18 in San Francisco on May 29, 30, and 31, and 7 in Los Angeles on June 5 and 6. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:24 am by Benjamin Wittes
The Judge’s answer is superior to Sarah Palin’s: The Los Angeles Times, USA Today, the Washington Post, and others. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:00 am
The Los Angeles Superior Court denied the petition; that order was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:53 am by Sheldon Toplitt
SC116851) filed last week in Los Angeles County Superior Court, two of Hollywood's most elite stars sued two companies for allegedly misappropriating their images.The Hollywood Reporter's THR, Esq. blog reported exclusively on the filing of the 14-page complaint that includes counts alleging trademark infringement under the Lanham Act [15 U.S.C. sec. 1125], misappropriation [Cal. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:38 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
Burbank Police Department et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case BC414602, Filed May 28, 2009. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:01 pm by Bruce Nye
Superior Court, County of Los Angeles (April 25, 2012) ___Cal.App.4th___ (2nd Dist. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:35 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Weeks of Cumberland County Superior Court drew national coverage, with the Los Angeles Times and The New York Times calling it a landmark ruling. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Kuhl, in the Complex Civil Litigation Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and then for U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:03 am by Victoria VanBuren
Defendant appealed an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California, denying his petition to confirm an arbitration award. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by AALRR
"  The case was deemed fully briefed on March 26, 2012, but on April 11, 2012, the  Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters filed a request for permission to file an amicus curiae brief in support of the plaintiff and appellant. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Lara
”  Not much of a reprieve for CytoSport, which must be exhausted from fighting a California Proposition 65 class action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court wherein the court recently approved a settlement enabling consumers who purchased any Muscle Milk®, Monster Milk®, CytoMax®, or Mighty Milk® product between June 4, 2006 and January 5, 2012 to file a claim to receive “up to $20. [read post]