Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 841 - 860
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 6:19 pm
Started on Doherty, but on closer inspection, the Lords have also given me R (On The Application of M) (Fc) V Slough Borough Council and R (On The Application of Heffernan) (Fc) V The Rent Service to deal with, and possibly also Yeoman’s Row Management Limited and Another V Cobbe. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
I hope Fisher Meredith can take this one to the Lords. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
The House of Lords is due to hand down judgment in Doherty v Birmingham tomorrow (30/7). [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Rep. 489, 498 (1763) (Lord Chief Justice Pratt). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
I'm in the job market. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:22 am
" "Yes, Your Worship (or M'Lord). [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 10:48 pm
On applications for permission to appeal to the House of Lords: Omar v Birmingham City Council - Omar refused permission to appeal from this Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:23 am
I speak, of course, about Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
I’m not going to go into great detail on the five separate judgments from the House of Lords in LB Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, but I do want to look at where it leaves us and what the problems are with the judgments. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
I’m not going to go into great detail on the five separate judgments from the House of Lords in LB Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, but I do want to look at where it leaves us and what the problems are with the judgments. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
And I’m still not sure how it is brought about here. [read post]
18 May 2008, 3:35 pm
Doherty v Birmingham in the Lords will give some clarification, but it is going to be fun in the County Courts for a while. [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:48 am
FIRST TEST, Lord's (day three, rain stopped play): England 89-0 v New Zealand 277 "A magnum of Roederer Cristal please "George asked the pretty waitress behind the counter, producing his 'Red' Amex card to pay for it. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:12 am
Good Lord, I miss seeing my family. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
The Court of Appeal found that there was sufficient unclarity and range of views in the medical evidence that the question the recorder should have addressed himself to was whether the review officer’s decision was Wednesbury unreasonable: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223, per Lord Greene MR in particular at 233- 4. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Selma, Lord, Selma (TVM 1999). [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
I’m speaking about ‘Expression 2.0‘ tomorrow afternoon. [read post]
