Search for: "MARRIAGE OF A R C" Results 841 - 860 of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2011, 3:37 pm by Gabriel Saldana
President Obama had previously stated that his administration will not defend Defense of Marriage Act cases because he considers the law to be discriminatory. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:37 pm by Gabriel Saldana
President Obama had previously stated that his administration will not defend Defense of Marriage Act cases because he considers the law to be discriminatory. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:25 am by Jan von Hein
Relevant content include the following: NEW LEGISLATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION OF JAPANESE COURTS ON PERSONAL STATUS LITIGATIONSAND DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES Aki Kitazawa, Introductory Note, p. 118 Yuko Nishitani, New International Civil Procedure Law of Japan in Status and Family Matters, p. 119 Yuko Nishitani, International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters in Japan, p. 151 Masako Murakami, International Jurisdiction of Child-Related Cases in Japan, p. 189 Takami Hayashi,… [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
 November 24, 2021Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state In Matter of Phillip D.S. --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5364714, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:13 am by Mark Ashton
When the 2022 draft return came through, Schedule C was missing. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:00 pm
About 15 years ago, the counsel ruled that half the income obtained during the marriage belongs to the women. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Scalia put the point in the jurisdictional portion of his dissent from the 2013 ruling striking down the Defense of Marriage Act, US courts perform the role of deciding on the constitutionality of legislation “incidentally—by accident, as it were—when that is necessary to resolve the dispute before” them.Scalia was right, but only technically. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:31 pm
ORCP 71B(1)(c), FRCP 60(b)(3); see, Matter of Marriage of Eltzroth, 67 Or App 520, 679 P2d 1369 (1984) (Decree could be set aside because husband misrepresented value of his business. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
The marriage broke down in 2015; there had been some domestic violence at that stage and C vacated the property. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 5:41 am
Some Observations on the Recognition of (Same-Sex) Marriages in International Organizations; Catherine Kessedjian, Les actions collectives en dommages et intérêts pour infraction aux règles communautaires de la concurrence et le droit international privé; Peter Kindler, Libertà di stabilimento e diritto internazionale privato delle… [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
The Perry suit only seeks an injunction against the officials preventing them from enforcing Proposition 8 to deny same-sex marriage. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:52 am by Keith A. Davidson
  For example, California does NOT recognize common-law marriage, unless such marriage is established in another State that does recognize common-law marriage (such as Texas). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
(C) That party did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party. [read post]