Search for: "MATTER OF A J S" Results 841 - 860 of 21,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
June 11, 2020 Cherry, J.), the court granted the carrier’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and dismissed a Plaintiff’s claims for treble damages and attorney’s fees in a PRO case.According to the Opinion, this matter involved a PRO case filed by a chiropractor in Dauphin County. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:47 pm
Sanghi J. held that this is irrelevant, because Explanation IV to s. 11 provides that any matter which ought to have been raised in the former suit as a ground of defence or attack shall be deemed to have been a matter directly or substantially in issue in that suit. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:09 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court acknowledged that this matter would come under an exception to the “coming and going” rule found in the Worker's Compensation context, which states that a worker not in scope of employment in worker's compensation matters when coming and going to and from work. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
However, Henry Carr J's judgment provides some comfort and scope to limit the introduction of such evidence and the weight attached to it. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
May 7, 2019 Zulick, J.) is an example of a case in which a trial court allowed a Plaintiff to amend a Complaint at the of trial to add a claim for punitive damages.According to the Briefs filed in the matter, the case arose out of motor vehicle accident between a Martz Bus and the Plaintiff's vehicle. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:55 am by Daniel E. Cummins
April 23, 2011, Joyner, J.), Judge J. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Adam Levitin
And as with J&J's previous attempts, this one has some pretty glaring issues.Yet because of J&J's ability to forum shop and even picks its judge, none of these issues are likely to get a meaningful adjudication, much less appellate review. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that plaintiff's customizable advertising patent was invalid for lack of patentable subject matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:09 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of patentable subject matter because plaintiff's e-commerce patents lacked an inventive concept. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This matter was apparently going up on appeal as it appeared that the trial court’s opinion was a Rule 1925 Opinion. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 7:12 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that plaintiff's temporal artery thermometer patent was invalid for lack of patentable subject matter and found that the claims lacked an inventive concept. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
May 7, 2021) (Op. by Kunselman, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that a trial court erred in opening a default judgment where the Defendant failed to establish a meritorious defense and violated Rule 237.3 by failing to attach Preliminary Objections or an Answer and New Matter to the Defendant’s Petition to Open a Default Judgment. [read post]