Search for: "MDL Panel" Results 841 - 860 of 1,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Last year, the MDL Panel denied an attempt to centralize all of the federal "shoulder pain pump - chondrolysis" cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:27 am
Some have expressed the sentiment that the the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation always grants requests for MDL status. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
The Panel will hear its next round of cases on July 30 in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 9:23 am
A typical MDL Panel ruling takes approximately six weeks. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 5:41 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has consolidated a number of lawsuits brought over defective drywall made in China. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:47 am
See In re: Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2047 (JPML). [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 8:38 am
(MDL junkies, take heart -- the Panel did send two pieces of litigation our way recently, the Kaplan qui tam cases to "seasoned jurist" Judge Seitz, and the checking overdraft cases to the heavily seasoned Judge King). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:11 am
Per a federal MDL Panel, the pre-trial court matters for the Chinese drywall class action lawsuits being filed on the behalf of American consumers will be handled in the United States District Court's Eastern District court in New Orleans, Louisiana. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:38 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:37 am
Miritello, associates at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, write that a litigant may employ several tactics to avoid transfer and inclusion of an individual case in proceedings before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, including generating some 'activity' in the case to bolster arguments to the MDL Panel that the action is either "unique" and/or "too far advanced" for transfer. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
The defense filed a Motion to Stay on March 20th that specifically requested the Court to stop all litigation and wait for the MDL Panel to rule on what venue would be taken. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
On May 28, 2009, the multidistrict litigation panel heard argument in Louisville, Ky. for treatment as an MDL. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:45 pm
” A federal judge in the Eastern District of Missouri granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on a multitude of cases pending against the dairy, various retailers selling the dairy products and others (originally these suits were filed in various federal courts around the country but were consolidated for pretrial purposes by the United States Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation or MDL). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 7:34 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers in three of the class actions filed motions with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:39 am
In Re: FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1873 (E.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The healthcare defendants did not join in the removal.The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation then transferred the case from the Western District of Louisiana to the Northern District of Ohio, where the Heparin MDL proceeding was pending. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:36 am
In originally creating this MDL in 2006, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation noted that the actions shared allegations relating to the safety of Celexa or Lexapro and the adequacy of Forest's warnings concerning the possible adverse effects of using the drugs, in particular, the potential for each product to induce its users to commit, or attempt to commit, suicide. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:18 am
Plaintiffs in the California class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:45 am
Defense attorneys for Aetna filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]