Search for: "Makes Him First v. United States of America" Results 841 - 860 of 1,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Just read Federalist 63 and the proud assertion by Madison that the actual demos has no role whatsoever to play in making any concrete decisions. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am by Bernard Bell
First, FOIA “limits what an agency can charge noncommercial requesters to cover the costs of any search and response. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am by Guest Blogger
”[v] In making this point, Farmer cited the earlier case of DeShaney v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am by Ken White
Whoever commits criminal sexual penetration in the first degree is guilty of a first degree felony. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
First, the trial judge made no error in applying the test set out in R. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This bill might not make it out of the Ohio House of Representatives; it might not be passed by the Senate; and it might not be signed by the current governor or the one who will replace him in January. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Please include him in your prayers.]I shall not speculate on the response(s), if any, that those in ECUSA's leadership might make to this development. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ginsburg also reported that the administration of the death penalty in the United States is now limited to a handful of counties in five states and that the number of executions has declined from 98 in 1999 to 20 in 2016. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Helen Klein
The government characterizes it as a factual question—one that (a) the military commission should answer in the first instance (which is why it argues for Councilman abstention), and (b) that can and should be made now in retrospect about the state of affairs in 2000. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am by Sebastian Brady
But while these amendments might make an Iran deal easier to conclude by torpedoing the review legislation, an apparent fundamental misunderstanding between Iran and the United States about the deal may complicate things, Jack added. [read post]