Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 21,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
” “”A release is a contract, and its construction is governed by contract law” (Schiller v Guthrie, 102 AD3d 852, 853 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cardinal Holdings, Ltd. v Indotronix Intl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:52 pm
Supreme Court will decide whether to grant the Petition for Writ of Certiorari in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:33 am
In Groff v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
Data shows that most elections in Africa undertaken during ostensible transitions from military rule to civilian government have missed the mark on credibility. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
See Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
” State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
In the Smith v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
A recent Washington Post column stated—misleadingly, if not just plain wrongly—that Google spent billions “to hide this setting from you. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Mark Coulson (D. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:13 am
" Trek Bicycle Corporation v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
From today's decision in State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
In a guest post, Mark Hill looks at an interesting judgment from Uganda on the limits of the secular courts’ jurisdiction over the internal affairs of Churches. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
The bombshell opinion in Spireon stated that when an applicant proffers third-party trademark registrations for identical marks to show that the Opposer’s mark is too weak to prevent registration of the Applicant’s mark, the Opposer has the burden to prove that those marks are not in use. [read post]