Search for: "Matter of Baby M." Results 841 - 860 of 1,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
Detective M replied that he could, but would have to wait until Detective M was finished with something that he was doing. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As an example only, a professor or other university employee could not, during office hours, counsel a specific student to abort her baby, or refer that student to an abortionist in order to abort her baby. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
I’m going to run through a brief chronology of new sources of information first and then make a few observations. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by resistance
  I’ve lost count by now, but I’m sure it numbers in the dozens. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, applying this test and on the basis of the moving papers of the plaintiff, the Court herein grants the application of the plaintiff, Gloria M. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:58 am by admin
I’m a licensed attorney so I have no criminal record. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:37 am by Dan Wallach
Still, if you’ve got insecure devices on your home network, your border router matters a lot. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm by Helen Sanders
They can burrow into your skin, depositing eggs and fecal matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
  A couple walked by; the man carrying a baby in a sling on his front, his wife paddling along beside him carrying a bag full of baby bottles, nappies, rattles and other baby parapernalia. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:26 pm by Daniel Shaviro
I’m personally a fan of the first two but not the third, and could discuss why in the Q&A. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Barrett faults the majority for splitting the baby, holding that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction, but lacked jurisdiction to issue an injunction: Acting on a compressed timeline, it embraces a theory of §1252(f )(1) that—so far as I can tell—no court of appeals has ever adopted: that §1252(f )(1) limits only the lower courts' remedial authority, not their subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  Now I’m writing scholarly pieces defending the decision. [read post]