Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
This is solid proof that your vote matters. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
So I’m concerned about that. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
By Lawrence M. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Maybe some youth extra small shirts and some socks, the kinds of things that a) won’t sell much, b) won’t be terribly visible when worn, but c) will be enough to keep ownership rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 10:56 am
That legislation would ban arrests for non-jailable Class C misdemeanor offenses. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:25 am
C. v Bellefonte Ins. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Maybe some youth extra small shirts and some socks, the kinds of things that a) won’t sell much, b) won’t be terribly visible when worn, but c) will be enough to keep ownership rights. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
I’m not sure if the 4th Circuit has followed suit, but probably. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
(Ugh, why not just do fair use as a matter of law?) [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:33 pm
The far more interesting (and clear-cut) issue, however, is whether the parrot's statement is hearsay.Hearsay, according to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(c), means a "statement" that:(1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement.Is the parrot's "statement" of "Don't f------- shoot" hearsay? [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:21 pm
Statutory Rape / § 53a-71 is a Class B Felony if the other person is under 16 years old and otherwise a Class C Felony in Connecticut. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
Author Michael B. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Coplay Cement Co., 44 F 277: no cause of action for false advertising of geographic origin b/c of Pandora’s box—no one can sue for public nuisance w/o specific injury/invasion of property right. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
– DC Guest Post by David M. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
See Jane C. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm
(c) Section 44303(b) of such title is amended by striking `October 31, 2010,’ and inserting `December 31, 2010,’. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
R. 206(c)(1) (emphasis mine). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
It has also been argued that the matter of double patenting by two EP patents is not an EPO matter, but a matter of national law - as it is of double patenting between an EP patent and a national patent or national utility model (Art. 139(3) EPC).In oral proceedings in early February this year, the Board decided to refer questions to the Enlarged Board to clarify the matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
In 2004 Mrs M and their daughter came to join Mr M in the UK. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
What I'm about to write may therefore be doubly a waste of time: (a) it's about the issue Watson derides; and (b) I haven't read Putnam, but I've read an interpretation of Putnam on this issue. [read post]
