Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 841 - 860 of 866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm by Gareth
Applying Wal-Mart Stores, I conclude that the released conduct would not arise out of the  “identical factual predicate” as the conduct that is the subject of the settled claims. 396 F.3d at 107 (citation omitted). c. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:08 pm by Allan Erbsen
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In addition to converting their class certification rulings into class action settlements with higher values and pay-outs, plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the court referred to the SEC staff’s no-action letter process on shareholder proposals as a “we-know-it-when-we-see-it” approach. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The report also makes an unusually direct pitch for the EEOC to be the litigation partner of choice in overcoming mandatory employment arbitration agreements and the challenges to the plaintiffs’ bar of bringing statistical disparate impact cases under Title VII in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision rendering class certification based on mere statistical evidence untenable in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, as is set out below, they may have no option other than to do so, as there is an increasing tendency to join the internet service provider as a defendant in proceedings. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco May 31, 2013, A135745) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:02 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
One of the tables had a sticker showing it was sold by Wal-Mart for $247. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Duane Reade, Inc., 342 NLRB 1016, 1017 (2004). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]