Search for: "Meyers v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 1,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
What the trial court, Judge Patrick Meyers (in LA), did. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Meyer, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC Moderator: William J. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Erin Miller
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), and through payment of petition circulators in Meyer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:10 am by R.J. MacReady
Today the CCA handed down published opinions in the following cases:PD-1205-08, State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
The State charged Pamela Langham with possession of cocaine and a jury found her guilty. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:49 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
Rib City Grill is a franchised concept, with 12 locations in Florida and operations in an additional seven states. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am by R.J. MacReady
Consequently, his subsequent claim should be procedurally barred.Judge Meyers dissented without an opinion. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Meyers first noted that the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. [read post]