Search for: "Morris v State" Results 841 - 860 of 2,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm by Lucy Reed
X v UK is inconsistent with other more persuasive authorities like Airey v Ireland, Steel & Morris v UK (2005) 41 EHRR 22,  and W v UK (1988) 10 EHRR 29 which, significantly, is a family law authority. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Mensing; the decisions of the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits in Morris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Mensing; the decisions of the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits in Morris v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
In dismissing the employee’s claim, the Eleventh Circuit had relied on its 1998 decision in Morris v Crow, in which the appeals court found that a deputy sheriff’s deposition testimony regarding his investigation of a fatal car crash between another officer and a citizen was unprotected because his decision to testify was motivated solely by his desire to comply with a subpoena. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1056-57 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:13 am by Andrew Hamm
 The Court denied cert. in Morris v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Gelman
Wodka, EsqOSHA’s Intent Not To Preempt State Tort Law Claims by the HazCom Standard (American Tort Reform Ass'n v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:09 pm by Jon Gelman
County of Morris will discuss the recent NJ Supreme Court "Off-Premises" (Coming and Going Rule) decision.Understand why state tort law claims for failure to warn of chemical dangers are not preempted by OSHA’s HazCom standard. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:42 am by Rick Hills
In particular, local agencies should not be subject to the same strict non-delegation doctrine by which state agencies are arguably constrained under Boreali v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
He falsely stated that he was unmarried, was in the process of selling a different house, and was not obligated to pay child support. [read post]