Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy" Results 841 - 860 of 3,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:34 am by John McFarland
Wade Caldwell, San Antonio attorney and President of NARO-Texas, published the article below in the recent NARO newsletter. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In terms of defining what is meant by a parody, we have the Court of Justice of the European Union’s definition in the case of Deckmyn v Vandersteen (C-201/13). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Timbs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]