Search for: "Nevada v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am
Finally, Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
In 1971, in a case called Bivens v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am
Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:09 am
Nevada State Bar, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991), the United States Supreme Court held that while lawyers have the First Amendment right to make comments to the press, they do not have the right to make comments that have a “substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
See Determination of Threatened Status for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States, 64 Fed.Reg. 58,910 (Nov. 1, 1999). [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm
In reaching that result, the panel applied a “heightened scrutiny” analysis, saying that was now necessary after the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:58 am
When the Ninth Circuit panel in January declared the new standard for sexual orientation claims, it found that such a standard was necessary from a between-the-lines reading of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:43 am
United States before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
United Cerebral Palsy has compiled a comprehensive Resource Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy in Colorado. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:01 am
However, The BLT’s Tony Mauro quotes two “judicial ethics experts” who argue that Code of Conduct for United States Judges does not apply to Supreme Court justices, and that even if it did, there is nothing “ethically wrong with O’Connor has done. [read post]
